Karl Palmen (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | I recall Michael Ossipoff suggested a seasonal calendar in which the year has 14 months 12 of which had 4 weeks each and two had 2 weeks each and one month gets an extra week in a leap year. |
+ | I recall Michael Ossipoff suggested a seasonal calendar in which the year has 14 months 12 of which had 4 weeks each and two had 2 weeks each and one month gets an extra week in a leap year. |
+ | ----------------------------------------------- |
||
+ | Ossipoff repliels: |
||
+ | Yes, but I discarded those explicitly terrestrial-seasonal proposals because: |
||
+ | 1. They'd be considerably inconvenient with regard to payment-periods. |
||
+ | 2. Their season-names and structure have no chance of acceptance in the current world. |
||
+ | So now my only propsosals are South-Solstice WeekDate and South-Solstice Equal 28-Day Months. |
||
+ | Of those, South-Solstice WeekDate is my main and favorite proposal. |
||
+ | (...though ISO WeekDate is acceptable and probably more adoptable now.) |
||
+ | ________________________________- |
||
+ | The month names were like what Crissov put in this article. [[User:Karl Palmen|Karl Palmen]] ([[User talk:Karl Palmen|talk]]) 20:07, January 24, 2019 (UTC) |
||
==Duplication of Year Start Rule== |
==Duplication of Year Start Rule== |
||
The same year start rule is explicitly written on this page and also the [[South-Solstice WeekDate Calendar]] page. It would be better if the Year Start rule were put on a separate page linked from both these pages [[User:Karl Palmen|Karl Palmen]] ([[User talk:Karl Palmen|talk]]) 19:30, January 27, 2019 (UTC) |
The same year start rule is explicitly written on this page and also the [[South-Solstice WeekDate Calendar]] page. It would be better if the Year Start rule were put on a separate page linked from both these pages [[User:Karl Palmen|Karl Palmen]] ([[User talk:Karl Palmen|talk]]) 19:30, January 27, 2019 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | -------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
+ | |||
+ | Ossipoff replies: |
||
+ | |||
+ | Though that would slightly reduce the amount of text at the website, I feel that it's more important that the year-start rule be shown at each of those 2 pages, without someone having to click on something. |
||
+ | |||
+ | The year-start rule is an essential and integral part of both proposals, and needs to be a built-in part of each of those pages. |
||
+ | |||
+ | A link to elsewhere is, in my perception, for something that's a footnote, or a reference to something else. ...not for something that's an essential part of the page. |
||
+ | |||
+ | Michael Ossipoff |
||
+ | |||
+ | 6 M (South-Solstice WeekDate) |
||
+ | |||
+ | 5M (ISO WeekDate (but not with ISO format) ) |
||
+ | |||
+ | Dua Week 2 Monday (South-Solstice Equal 28-Day Months) |
||
+ | |||
+ | (My long name for that latter proposal is intended to tell a non-calendarist what the calendar is intended to achieve.) |
Revision as of 18:16, 28 January 2019
I recall Michael Ossipoff suggested a seasonal calendar in which the year has 14 months 12 of which had 4 weeks each and two had 2 weeks each and one month gets an extra week in a leap year.
Ossipoff repliels: Yes, but I discarded those explicitly terrestrial-seasonal proposals because: 1. They'd be considerably inconvenient with regard to payment-periods. 2. Their season-names and structure have no chance of acceptance in the current world. So now my only propsosals are South-Solstice WeekDate and South-Solstice Equal 28-Day Months. Of those, South-Solstice WeekDate is my main and favorite proposal. (...though ISO WeekDate is acceptable and probably more adoptable now.) ________________________________- The month names were like what Crissov put in this article. Karl Palmen (talk) 20:07, January 24, 2019 (UTC)
Duplication of Year Start Rule
The same year start rule is explicitly written on this page and also the South-Solstice WeekDate Calendar page. It would be better if the Year Start rule were put on a separate page linked from both these pages Karl Palmen (talk) 19:30, January 27, 2019 (UTC)
Ossipoff replies:
Though that would slightly reduce the amount of text at the website, I feel that it's more important that the year-start rule be shown at each of those 2 pages, without someone having to click on something.
The year-start rule is an essential and integral part of both proposals, and needs to be a built-in part of each of those pages.
A link to elsewhere is, in my perception, for something that's a footnote, or a reference to something else. ...not for something that's an essential part of the page.
Michael Ossipoff
6 M (South-Solstice WeekDate)
5M (ISO WeekDate (but not with ISO format) )
Dua Week 2 Monday (South-Solstice Equal 28-Day Months)
(My long name for that latter proposal is intended to tell a non-calendarist what the calendar is intended to achieve.)